December 9,
2005
MONTREAL, Dec. 8 - On
Wednesday night, as negotiations over the future of two international
agreements on global warming ground on, it was time for a break.
The lobbyists for coal and
oil companies and the nuclear power industry fanned out to Montreal's storied
restaurants and high-priced hotels. The campaigners for big environmental
groups hunkered down to talk strategy.
But a stream of
participants hiked through the frigid night to a corner building on the far
side of Chinatown that pulsed with light and thudding music. Inside, a local
nonprofit group called Apathy Is Boring was giving a party.
There was no apathy in
attendance - just 300 people, most in their 20's, who had come from as far away
as Australia and Los Angeles to pester the "fossils" - the legions of
gray-suited negotiators who, these young people said, were hijacking their
future.
"Major social changes
start with a shift in philosophy, and then a new generation is born with that
at their core," said Josh Tulkin, 24, who works for a group focused on
climate issues in the region outside Washington, D.C., and also for a network
of youth organizations called SustainUs. "That generation is us."
Some wore T-shirts
emblazoned with a message aimed at delegates: "Stop asking how much it
will cost you and start asking how much it will cost us."
Through nearly two weeks of
treaty talks here, the young attendees, more than 500 in all, have been staging
daily demonstrations, mainly lighthearted, to highlight the meeting's
importance for their generation. And they have been buttonholing delegates to
share their concerns about the lack of significant new action to cut greenhouse
gases linked to global warming.
On Thursday, the major
action of the day was a "bed-in" on the sprawling polished floor
outside the main meeting rooms. About 15 people lay down on pillows near
pictures of a similar protest staged in Montreal in 1969 by John Lennon and
Yoko Ono.
They started singing old
Beatles songs, but with new lyrics: "We all live in a carbon-intensive
world" and "All we are saying is give youth a chance."
The first young people who
attended climate negotiations came at the invitation of Greenpeace in 2000,
fanning out in the halls at a meeting in The Hague aimed at completing the
Kyoto Protocol, one of the agreements being discussed here. But in the past,
they were mostly recruited by big international environment groups. Now many of
them are from homegrown independent nonprofit groups of their own making, many
focused on local issues like cutting universities' use of fossil fuels. They
have their own Web sites, with one Web log, itsgettinghotinhere.org,
the centerpiece.
"It has gone
viral," said John Passacantando, the executive director of Greenpeace USA,
in a telephone interview. "There's never been a social movement that
didn't have young people as the moral standard bearers. They realize the fate
of their world is being decided in the shadows at these conventions."
There is little time for
leisure. While some delegates went shopping with the per diem money provided by
the United Nations, the campaigners, wielding cellphones and laptops, continued
pressing delegations for meetings. On Thursday, about a dozen young people
trooped through a maze of corridors to a room used by American negotiators for
confidential talks. There they sat around a rectangular table with Daniel A.
Reifsnyder, the director of the State Department's office of global change.
They met in part to lay out
their case for new actions to reduce greenhouse gases, but also to complain
about the fate of Nia Robinson, a young campaigner from Detroit working for
Environmental Justice and Climate Change Initiative, a group focused on the
social impact of global warming.
She had been ejected from
the meeting hall on Wednesday for trying to deliver a "climate change
survival pack" to American officials, consisting of a face mask for air
pollution, a life jacket to counter the threat of rising sea levels and a can
of Spam, symbolizing the potential disruption of traditional food sources for
indigenous people.
They were politely told
that the United States had nothing to do with her expulsion, which was carried
out by security officials working for the United Nations. They were also told
that the United States had no plans to start negotiating new agreements on
climate change, that existing policies were already producing results.
As they emerged, Mr.
Tulkin, of SustainUs, was near tears.
"While this upsets us, it also motivates us to go back and fight as hard as we can back in the United States," he said. "We know we have to take it back into our own hands. That's what we're doing at the cities, the campus and our communities. This is our future and we need to take control of it right now, today, take action."